Comparative evaluation of crop productivity and profitability under traditional farming and integrated farming system in Northern plains of India

Authors

  • R. B. Rai Indian Veterinary Research Institute
  • K. Dhama Indian Veterinary Research Institute
  • S. chakraborty Animal Resources Development Department, Pt. Nehru Complex, Agartala, Tripura, India
  • R. A. Ram Indian Veterinary Research Institute
  • Balvir Singh Indian Veterinary Research Institute
  • R. Tiwari Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwa Vidyalaya Evam Go‐Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura (U.P.), India
  • M. Saminathan Indian Veterinary Research Institute
  • T. Damodaran Central Saline Soil Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38150/sajeb.3(5).p220-225

Abstract

Agriculture is the mainstream of livelihood security in northern plains of India, however, production of all crops is below expected levels. Various studies have indicated that impact of recent technological innovations is not up to desired levels. The present study was conducted to evaluate profitability of various models in existing and intervened integrated farming system (IFS) along with acceptance of farmers in northern plains of Uttar Pradesh, India. Twenty farmers from each district viz. Barabanki and Raebareli, were monitored with all accessible records. Various interventions in their farming system were made which included new technology of rural poultry production (Modelâ€1), infertility control, vegetable production using our bioâ€enhancer (CSRâ€BIO), gladiolus, banana (Gâ€9 variety), guava (semiâ€intensive), goat and awareness about improved composting and quality seeds. The preâ€dominant farming system with 16 families was paddyâ€wheatâ€fallow with benefit: cost (B: C) ratio of 1.83. This was followed by paddyâ€wheatâ€green gramâ€bovines in 7 families with B: C ratio of 1.66. The highest B: C ratio of 4.78 was observed in modelâ€R i.e. vegetables cultivations on river bank due to varietal and CSRBIO interventions. The lowest B: C ratio (2.09) in post intervention period was observed in modelâ€O (guavaâ€bovineâ€vegetables) due to no return from guava in first 2 years. The family annual income in the survey increased significantly. The IFS models, if introduced, are highly useful and uniform acceptance of the components takes time. From the present study, it clearly emerged that IFS gives higher B: C ratio than the existing cropping/ farming system.

Author Biographies

R. B. Rai, Indian Veterinary Research Institute

Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh

K. Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute

Division of Pathology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh

S. chakraborty, Animal Resources Development Department, Pt. Nehru Complex, Agartala, Tripura, India

Animal Resources Development Department, Pt. Nehru Complex, Agartala, Tripura, India

R. A. Ram, Indian Veterinary Research Institute

 Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh

Balvir Singh, Indian Veterinary Research Institute

 Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh

R. Tiwari, Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwa Vidyalaya Evam Go‐Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura (U.P.), India

Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwa Vidyalaya Evam Goâ€Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura (U.P.), India

M. Saminathan, Indian Veterinary Research Institute

Indian Veterinary Research Institute

T. Damodaran, Central Saline Soil Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Central Saline Soil Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Downloads

Published

2013-12-07

Issue

Section

Research Articles